So, to start out, I think I'll kick it old-school:
- I believe in one God,
- the Father Almighty,
- maker of heaven and earth
- and of all things visible and invisible.
- And in one Lord Jesus Christ,
- the only-begotten Son of God,
- begotten of His Father before all worlds,
- God of God, Light of Light,
- very God of very God,
- begotten, not made,
- being of one substance with the Father,
- by whom all things were made;
- who for us men and for our salvation came down from heaven
- and was incarnate by the Holy Spirit of the virgin Mary
- and was made man;
- and was crucified also for us under Pontius Pilate.
- He suffered and was buried.
- And the third day He rose again according to the Scriptures
- and ascended into heaven
- and sits at the right hand of the Father.
- And He will come again with glory to judge both the living and the dead,
- whose kingdom will have no end.
- And I believe in the Holy Spirit,
- the Lord and giver of life,
- who proceeds from the Father and the Son,
- who with the Father and the Son together is worshiped and glorified,
- who spoke by the prophets.
- And I believe in one holy catholic and apostolic Church,
- I acknowledge one Baptism for the remission of sins,
- and I look for the resurrection of the dead
- and the life of the world to come. Amen.
This is most certainly True! Amen.
ReplyDeleteToday is the feast of the Fathers of the First Ecumenical Council, which was responsible for most of this.
ReplyDeleteI've always found it ironic that the Reformation accepted the specifically Roman Catholic, Frankish/Hildebrandine Papist recension of the Creed.
Orrologion-
ReplyDeletethank you for commenting on my humble blog! I have seen yours, and I enjoy it.
Sorry for not replying quicker- I have been busy in life.
While I have come to conclusion that the addition of the filioque should not have been added without the approval of an Ecumencial Council, I have yet to find disagreement the theology of the Double Procession of the Spirit. I am currently looking into the issue.
Apart from the obviously serious theological and doctrinal issues, it is the irony that is indeed quite noteworthy. But is some respects it is all too predictable as the reformation remained stuck in western categories of thought.
ReplyDeleteApophatically Speaking-
ReplyDeletethank you for your comment! Again, I am sorry I took so long to reply. Life is hectic, and I blog when I can ^^;
Could you perhaps expand on your thought? :
"Apart from the obviously serious theological and doctrinal issues, it is the irony that is indeed quite noteworthy. But is some respects it is all too predictable as the reformation remained stuck in western categories of thought. "